If we are to develop new pedagogical approaches that value digital and technological ‘tools’ as capable of expressive and creative potential then we must look to the digital landscape as a range of possible languages rather than ‘tools’. In this, I mean, how can we view digital languages as poetic and aesthetic, as a means of narrating stories of life and the world and constructing new ways of knowing and knowledge.
If we consider clay, we can view this substance as both a material/tool and language. It can be used as a material/tool in which to develop fine motor skills through exploration of its properties, or it can be used in a context of ideas and thinking, where it is used to narrate and communicate meaning. It is the latter context in which myself and a group of UK and Swedish early childhood centres (see below) are currently researching.
Certainly, when I began working in ECE 20 years ago, where computers were present they were often used to develop skills in mouse control and page navigation. I remember then testing the boundaries of possibility by taking in my then huge laptop and being surprised at how 3 year olds were capable of exploring image manipulation in early versions of Adobe Photoshop. I could see the shift happening from the “What if” exploration of the material (in this instance, laptop and Photoshop) to the emergence of ideas of expression that communicated a thought about something within a realm of what Anna Craft would call “Possibility Thinking”.
As a network of researchers we are particularly interested in those types of apps, their usage and modalities that Howard Gardener discusses that can promote a strong sense of identity, allow deep relationships, and stimulate creativity. Our challenge is to go beyond the ways that apps are designed to be used so they can make visible the diversity of children’s experiences and thinking, and become capable of narrating and expressing new ideas. This is not easy as many children’s app developers create apps, for example animation apps, but with pre-loaded characters and backgrounds that children can use. These apps, although intuitive for children to use are creatively constrained already in the use of templates and pre-loaded material. They are easy to make a simple animation with but often without the depth of thinking that children are capable of.
Other digital modalities such as digital projection and green screen can be as playful in nature as role play and open ended materials and these form a great potential for multi-modal expression with children. Also, the ways in which digital endoscopes and microscopes can enable the re-proposal of the familiar world of nature in unexpected and complex ways that offer curious new worlds and environments to explore to generate new, imaginative ideas and questions.
As a research group we are interested in Gregory Bateson’s ideas of cybernetics, of systems, patterns and relationships, and will look for those connective patterns generated in the in-between spaces between children, digital languages and the natural world. Children already have a wealth of knowledge and an openness to ideas, we are interested in these new patterns of thinking that digital languages propose to children as we suspect that these will transform our pedagogy and approaches to learning.
In a weeks time, 10 educators and myself travel to Stockholm, Sweden for our first exchange in this research project. It is a blended approach that uses social media networks as well as offline, realtime exchanges together with digital and non digital materials. We are exchanging learning stories and reflecting on each others work in a process of active professional learning about children’s relationship to the digital and natural world. We are seeking and exploring ways for young children to connect across classrooms and across verbal and non-verbal languages. We aim to create a body of research in the form of case studies, publications, a conference and a range of online resources. It’s a very exciting time!
A possibility of a beginning…
“It’s starting to grow…slowly…it’s not growing yet, no not yet because the leaves haven’t come out.”
“It growed by itself because it’s invisible.”
Two children are interacting with a full screen moving time-lapse projection of a growing bean. Their own projected shadows become as one with the projected image, both projections combining as a single image. As children discuss their movements and the beans moments they consider what growing is, both in language and through movement. It is this coming together, this blending of modalities that we are most interested in.
“You pull this lever and this lever and this lever and then it will be grown… and then it lifts up.”
Alongside of these children, and interweaving amongst all the languages available for the children to express their ideas were others generating ideas of germination through drawing and clay. The clay offered opportunity for mechanical and physical expression of showing how the bean might grow. The drawing offered opportunity for visualising the ideas through imagery and ‘talk and draw’. All of these interweaving languages lend themselves to future ideas of stop motion animation (amongst others). Therefore we can begin to see where a traditional material such as clay may begin a dialogue with a digital language rather than concentrate solely on the app, the pre-loaded story characters and pre-generated backgrounds. In this way, children’s own creative and critical thinking creates both the context and the content.
The Schools involved in this research are:
Ashmore Park Nursery School, Wolverhampton, UK
Hillfields Nursery School and Children’s Centre, Coventry, UK
Madeley Nursery School, Telford & Wrekin, UK
Phoenix Nursery School, Wolverhampton, UK
Woodlands Primary and Nursery School, Telford & Wrekin, UK
Lange Erik Pre-School, Stockholm, Sweden
Barnasinnet Pre-School, Stockholm, Sweden
Vintergatan Pre-School, Stockholm, Sweden
Sma Vänner Pre-School, Stockholm, Sweden
With thanks to Ashmore Park Nursery School for enabling me to share this material.
We are very happy to be funded by Erasmus Plus in our shared research into new digital pedagogies with young children.
6 thoughts on “Technology in Early Childhood Education: Tools and Languages”
I am interested in knowing more about the connection between cybernetics and children’s use of technologies. I am wondering if you have written more about this and if you could provide a link to it, if you have.
Cybernetics is a new theory to me and I am interested in finding out more about in, in relation to technology use.
While listening to the ted talk by Debi Keyte: Hartland on Digital ECE which also talks on Technology in Early Childhood: Tools and Language. While also reading the article, the article talks about if we were to develop a new pedagogical approach that would value the digital and technological “tools” which are capable of expressive and creative potential which we must look into the digital landscapes as a range of possible languages as a range of possible languages rather than “tools”. It also connects in a way that it blends the approach in a way that it blends the approach that uses social media networks as well as offline, while real time exchanges together with digital and non digital materials. This article is valuable to me as an ECE professional as it talks about verbal and non verbal languages amongst children, social media and digital modules. It connects to my pedagogy and philosophy of ECE as it talks about the materials and tools we use to develop fine motor skills through exploration or it can be used in a context of ideas and thinking
Thank you for responding. My apologies that I have just seen it again to respond. I was at the time of your writing rather poorly with Covid. I am so happy to read now that you have considered by Tedx talk as useful. I am passionate about children’s potentialities to create and think with these digital modalities. It is not the tools themselves that are creative or expressive but in how we use them as materials, like we would with clay. Clay is not creative by itself perhaps, it needs the entanglement of being discovered, explored in a dialogue between the material and the maker.
Kind regards for your thinking,